个性化文献订阅>期刊> Journal of clinical oncology
 

Randomized Phase II Trial of Sunitinib on an Intermittent Versus Continuous Dosing Schedule As First-Line Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

  作者 Motzer, RJ; Hutson, TE; Olsen, MR; Hudes, GR; Burke, JM; Edenfield, WJ; Wilding, G; Agarwal, N; Thompson, JA; Cella, D; Bello, A; Korytowsky, B; Yuan, JY; Valota, O; Martell, B; Hariharan, S; Figlin, RA  
  选自 期刊  Journal of clinical oncology;  卷期  2012年30-12;  页码  1371-1377  
  关联知识点  
 

[摘要]Purpose Sunitinib has shown antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile as metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment, when given by the standard intermittent schedule as well as a continuous daily dosing (CDD) schedule. A trial was conducted to compare the schedules. Patients and Methods Patients with treatment-naive, clear cell advanced RCC were randomly assigned 1: 1 to receive sunitinib 50 mg/d for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off treatment (schedule 4/2; n = 146) or 37.5 mg/d on the CDD schedule (n = 146) for up to 2 years. The primary end point was time to tumor progression. Results Median time to tumor progression was 9.9 months for schedule 4/2 and 7.1 months for the CDD schedule (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.04; P = .090). No significant difference was observed in overall survival (23.1 v 23.5 months; P = .615), commonly reported adverse events, or patient-reported kidney cancer symptoms. Schedule 4/2 was statistically superior to CDD in time to deterioration, a composite end point of death, progression, and disease-related symptoms (P = .034). Conclusion There was no benefit in efficacy or safety for continuous dosing of sunitinib compared with the approved 50 mg/d dose on schedule 4/2. Given the numerically longer time to tumor progression with the approved 50 mg/d dose on schedule 4/2, adherence to this dose and schedule remains the treatment goal for patients with advanced RCC.

 
      被申请数(0)  
 

[全文传递流程]

一般上传文献全文的时限在1个工作日内