个性化文献订阅>期刊> Gastroenterology
 

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Quantitative Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening

  作者 Wilschut, JA; Hol, L; Dekker, E; Jansen, JB; van Leerdam, ME; Lansdorp-Vogelaar, I; Kuipers, EJ; Habbema, JDF; van Ballegooijen, M  
  选自 期刊  Gastroenterology;  卷期  2011年141-5;  页码  1648-U189  
  关联知识点  
 

[摘要]BACKGROUND & AIMS: Two European randomized trials (N = 30,000) compared guaiac fecal occult blood testing with quantitative fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and showed better attendance rates and test characteristics for FIT. We aimed to identify the most cost-effective FIT cutoff level for referral to colonoscopy based on data from these trials and allowing for differences in screening ages. METHODS: We used the validated MI-crosimulation SCreening ANalysis (MISCAN)-Colon microsimulation model to estimate costs and effects of different screening strategies for FIT cutoff levels of 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 ng/mL hemoglobin. For each cutoff level, screening strategies were assessed with various age ranges and screening intervals. We assumed sufficient colonoscopy capacity for all strategies. RESULTS: At all cost levels, FIT screening was most effective with the 50 ng/mL cutoff level. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of biennial screening between ages 55 and 75 years using FIT at 50 ng/mL, for example, was 3900 euro per life year gained. Annual screening had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 14,900 euro per life year gained, in combination with a wider age range (between ages 45 and 80 years). In the sensitivity analysis, 50 ng/mL remained the preferred cutoff level. CONCLUSIONS: FIT screening is more cost-effective at a cutoff level of 50 ng/mL than at higher cutoff levels. This supports the recommendation to use FIT at a cutoff level of 50 ng/mL, which is considerably lower than the values used in current practice.

 
      被申请数(0)  
 

[全文传递流程]

一般上传文献全文的时限在1个工作日内